Legal Opinion
Sweeney v. Board of Education of Mundelein Consolidated High School District 120
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided July 30, 1990No. 87 C 5527PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SHADUR, District Judge.
By way of a four-count complaint (the “Complaint”) and a supplemental complaint asserting comparable claims (the “Supplemental Complaint”), Robert Sweeney (“Sweeney”) complains of unfair treatment at the hands of his former employer, the Board of Education of Mundelein Consolidated High School District 120 (“Board”), and District 120’s then Superintendent of Schools Wayne R. Bottoni (“Bottoni”). Sweeney alleges that Board and Bottoni suspended him, required him to take psychiatric exams and subjected him to a remediation plan as retaliation…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Board of Education of the City of Chicago v. MooreIllinois Supreme Court · 2021
- Townsend, Gary v. Vallas, PaulCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- Arvinger v. Mayor & City Council of BaltimoreDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1993
- Gary Townsend v. Paul VallasCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001