Durant v. State

KURT S. ODENWALD, Presiding Judge *76Introduction

Patrick Durant ("Durant") appeals the denial of his Rule 24.0351 motion seeking post-conviction relief based on a claim that he received ineffective assistance of counsel at his probation revocation hearing. Because the facts alleged by Durant as to sentencing counsel's ineffectiveness and the resulting prejudice of sentencing counsel's conduct are refuted by the record, we affirm the motion court's denial of post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing.

Procedural Background

On July 6, 2015, Durant pleaded guilty to unlawful possession of…