Routt v. State

Opinion

Angela T. Quigless, J.

Jeremy S. Routt (“Movant”) appeals from a judgment denying his Rule 24.0351 post-conviction relief motion following‘an evidentiary hearing. Movant argues -the motion court clearly erred in denying his post-conviction relief motion because sentencing counsel was ineffective for failing to investigate, subpoena, and call his'stepsister to testify on his behalf at the sentencing hearing. Movant also argues for the first time on appeal that the plea court erroneously enhanced his stealing offense from a misdemeanor to a felony. Finding no error, we affirm.

Factual and…