Legal Opinion
Horby v. King
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided April 25, 1951PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
13 N.J. Super. 395 (1951)
80 A.2d 476
IRENE HORBY, PLAINTIFF,
v.
JACK WESLEY KING, DEFENDANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.
Decided April 25, 1951.
Messrs. Hodes & Hodes (Mr. Irving Hodes appearing), attorneys for plaintiff.
Mr. Thomas J. Markey, attorney for defendant.
HARTSHORNE, J.C.C. (temporarily assigned).
This cause arises on motion to dismiss the above action, upon affidavits and transcript of proceedings at the previous trial at which a mistrial was declared.
The complaint is in two counts, the first for an assault and battery upon plaintiff by defendant, the alleged facts…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Blackman v. IlesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
- Lasasso v. LasassoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
- Kopak v. PolzerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
- New Jersey Suburban Water Co. v. Town of HarrisonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1939
- Borough of Vineland v. MarettiNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1922
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Magierowski v. BuckleyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
- Woohyung Shim v. Kikkoman International Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1981
- State v. BurdenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985