Legal Opinion
Woohyung Shim v. Kikkoman International Corp.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided January 15, 1981No. Civ. 79-1071PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BIUNNO, District Judge.
The complaint in this case was filed April 17, 1979 setting out six counts alleging violations of the anti-trust laws (secs. 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act, sec. 2 of the Clayton Act as amended by the Robinson-Patman Act and sec. 3 of the Robinson-Patman Act).
The relief sought is a declaration of unlawfulness of certain alleged trade practices for the sale of oriental foodstuffs, treble damages, costs and attorneys fees.
Return was filed showing service of summons and complaint on defendant Kikkoman on April 24, 1979. Within the 35 days to answer or otherwise move,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Atwood v. FiskMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
- In Re FriedlandSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1971
- McBlain v. EdgarSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1901
- Wilson v. United States LinesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971
- Boston & Worcester Railroad v. DanaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1854
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Forrest v. CorzineDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2010
- United States v. McBrideDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1983
- In Re the Grand Jury Appearance Request by LoigmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
- State Ex Rel. Palumbo v. Graley's Body Shop, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1992
- TITUS, Thomas E., Appellant, v. MERCEDES BENZ OF NORTH AMERICACourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.