Legal Opinion

Maine National Bank v. Anderschat

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided July 11, 1983PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McKUSICK, Chief Justice.

On the single issue presented by this appeal, we hold that the Superior Court erred in dissolving an ex parte attachment on trustee process.

In District Court (Portland), third party plaintiffs Michael Anderschat and New England Dental Supply, Inc. (“attachment plaintiffs”) obtained an ex parte order for both a real estate attachment and an attachment by trustee process, in the amount of $20,000, against third party defendants Donald Gilbert and New England Dental, Inc. (“attachment defendants”). See M.R. Civ.P. 4A(f), 4B(h). Pursuant to the ex parte order, any and all…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Dartmouth Company v. Day's, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Penney v. Capitol City Transfer, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
  2. Beesley v. Landmark Realty, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
  3. Liberty v. LibertySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
  4. Morton v. MillerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1991
  5. Ricci v. Key Bancshares of Maine, Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API