Legal Opinion

State v. Finlayson

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 27, 2004No. 20020339PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILKINS, Justice:

¶ 1 Jeffery Russell Finlayson was originally convicted of rape, forcible sodomy, and aggravated kidnaping. On appeal, the aggravated kidnaping conviction was reversed. State v. Finlayson, 956 P.2d 283, 295 (Utah Ct.App.1998). When the case was eventually remitted to the trial court, that court resen-tenced Finlayson on the two remaining convictions, for which he had already been sentenced. The court of appeals affirmed that resentencing because of the lack of prejudice to Finlayson. We reverse because the trial court had no jurisdiction to resentence Fin-layson on the rape…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. Juan Pimienta-Redondo, United States of America v. Alfredo PupoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
  2. United States v. David BentleyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
  3. State v. FinlaysonUtah Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Beaver v. Qwest, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2001
  5. State ex rel. M.W.Utah Supreme Court · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Canfield v. Layton CityUtah Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State v. Chavez-EspinozaCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2008
  3. Savely v. Utah Highway PatrolUtah Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Canfield v. Layton CityUtah Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Finlayson v. State of UtahDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API