Legal Opinion

Canfield v. Layton City

Utah Supreme Court

Decided September 16, 2005No. 20040681Published

1Opinion of the Court

122 P.3d 622 (2005)

2005 UT 60

Machelle CANFIELD, Plaintiff and Petitioner,

v.

LAYTON CITY, a Utah Municipality, Defendant and Respondent.

No. 20040681.

Supreme Court of Utah.

September 16, 2005.

Brad C. Smith, Benjamin C. Rasmussen, Ogden, for plaintiff.

Stanley J. Preston, Camille N. Johnson, Judith D. Wolferts, Maralyn M. Reger, Ogden, for defendant.

On Certiorari to the Utah Court of Appeals

DURHAM, Chief Justice:

¶ 1 Plaintiff, Machelle Canfield, appealed the district court's rule 12(b)(1) dismissal of her wrongful termination action against defendant, Layton City, for lack of subject matter…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Berube v. Fashion Centre, Ltd.Utah Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Piacitelli v. Southern Utah State CollegeUtah Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Williams v. State Farm Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Wheeler v. McPhersonUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Coulter & Smith, Ltd. v. RussellUtah Supreme Court · 1998

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API