Conrad v. Medical Bd. of California
California Court of Appeal
Weissburg & Aronson, Foley, Lardner, Weissburg & Aronson, Gregory V. Moser, Parham & Associates and Jackson E. Parham for Plaintiffs and Appellants. Dennis M. Lynch and Regina Tanner as Amici Curiae on behalf of Plaintiffs and Appellants.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HUFFMAN, J.
This appeal presents the issue of whether Health and Safety Code 1 section 32129 creates an exception to the historic doctrine prohibiting the corporate practice of medicine, by expressly or impliedly expanding the powers of a hospital district or health care district to employ physicians, as opposed to treating these physicians as independent contractors. The plaintiffs and appellants are a local hospital district, Palomar Pomerado Health System (the District), and nine physicians with whom the District has employment agreements, Alan J. Conrad, M.D., et al. (collectively…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- Butterworth v. BoydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Tieberg v. Unemployment Ins. App. Bd.California Supreme Court · 1970
- Rudd v. California Casualty General InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- King v. MeeseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Gafcon, Inc. v. Ponsor & AssociatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Barnett v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- County of Sacramento v. State Water Resources Control BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- California Medical Ass'n v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- California Physicians' Service v. Aoki Diabetes Research InstituteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.