Legal Opinion

State v. Goddard

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided August 24, 2011No. 2 CA-CR 2011-0084-PRPublished

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ECKERSTROM, Presiding Judge.

¶ 1 Petitioner Joseph Goddard seeks review of the trial court’s order dismissing his petition for post-conviction relief, filed pursuant to Rule 32, Ariz. R.Crim. P., in which he alleged the court had violated his right to due process by concluding his offenses were dangerous crimes against children. “We will not disturb a trial court’s ruling on a petition for post-conviction relief absent a clear abuse of discretion.” State v. Swoopes, 216 Ariz. 390, ¶ 4, 166 P.3d 945, 948 (App.2007). Goddard has not sustained his burden of establishing such abuse here.

¶ 2…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. SwoopesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  2. State v. ThompsonArizona Supreme Court · 2001
  3. State v. GonzalezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  4. Pleak v. Entrada Property Owners' Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
  5. State v. FalknerArizona Supreme Court · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API