Salt Lake City v. Gardner
Utah Supreme Court
Appeal from District Court, Fourth District; Hon. J. E. Booth, Judge. Action by Salt Lake City and others against James A. Gardner and another. Judgment for defendants. Plaintiffs appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtFrick, C. J.
This action was instituted pursuant to section 1288x14, Comp. Laws 1907, to determine the right of respondents to-*32appropriate a specific quantity of water from Utah Lake. In September, 1905, pursuant to section 1288x6, respondents duly made and filed with, the state engineer their application to appropriate forty cubic feet of water per second of time from said lake. Appellants, pursuant to section 1288x9, duly protested said application, which protest the state engineer overruled and allowed respondents’ application, whereupon appellants brought this action to determine respondents’ rights…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Nash v. ClarkUtah Supreme Court · 1904
- Natoma Water & Mining Co. v. HancockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
3Cited by23 opinions
- Bingham v. Roosevelt City Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 2010
- State Ex Rel. Crowley v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1939
- Wayment v. HowardUtah Supreme Court · 2006
- Bower v. MoormanIdaho Supreme Court · 1915
- Hanson v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1949
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.