Legal Opinion

Natoma Water & Mining Co. v. Hancock

California Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1894No. 14847PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sacramento County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtBeatty, C.J.

This is an action to enjoin the appellants from diverting water from the South Fork of the American river at a point immediately above the dam of the respondent, and the principal question involved in the case may be stated as follows: If a prior appropriator of water constructs a dam across the bed of a stream for the purpose of raising its surface to a level which will cause it to flow into the head of his ditch, does he thereby acquire such an exclusive right in the bed and banks of the stream as far as the slack water extends above his dam that he can enjoin a subsequent appropriator of…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Peabody v. City of VallejoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Joslin v. Marin Municipal Water DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Thayer v. California Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Rank v. (Krug) United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1956
  5. Salt Lake City v. GardnerUtah Supreme Court · 1911

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API