Legal Opinion
Alston v. Robinson
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided March 31, 1992No. Civ. K-89-1866, K-89-2415PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FRANK A. KAUFMAN, Senior District Judge.
Plaintiffs in the within actions are inmates at Patuxent Institution (Patuxent), a Maryland prison facility, who challenge the constitutionality of the December 1, 1988 suspension of Patuxent’s work release and leave programs, the revocation of certain Patuxent inmates’ work release statuses and/or the application to some of those inmates of certain March 20, 1989 amendments to Patuxent’s enabling legislation.
Plaintiffs in Alston v. Robinson were all participants in Patuxent’s work release program prior to December 1, 1988. 1 They sue under 42 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited84 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- In Re RosenkrantzCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- Myers v. RidgeCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Secretary, Department of Public Safety & Correctional Services v. DembyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- Potomac Design, Inc. v. Eurocal Trading, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1993
- Commonwealth v. StarkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.