Legal Opinion
Total Recycling Services of Connecticut, Inc. v. Connecticut Oil Recycling Services, LLC
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 2, 2009No. AC 29721PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PETERS, J.
The law of contracts has long recognized that “[u]njust enrichment applies wherever justice requires compensation to be given for property or services rendered under a contract, and no remedy is available by an action on the contract.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Vertex, Inc. v. Waterbury, 278 Conn. 557, 573, 898 A.2d 178 (2006). In this case, a purchaser of goods and intangibles challenges the validity of a jury verdict holding it hable for damages for unjust enrichment despite a concurrent jury finding of breach of contract by the vendors. The purchaser also…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Schoonmaker v. Lawrence Brunoli, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Wards Company, Inc. v. Stamford Ridgeway Associates and Trim Fashions, Inc., Stamford Ridgeway AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Vertex, Inc. v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Storm Associates, Inc. v. BaumgoldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Meaney v. Connecticut Hospital Ass'nSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- LPP Mortgage, Ltd. v. LynchConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- Total Recycling Services of Connecticut, Inc. v. Connecticut Oil Recycling Services, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- Greene v. KeatingConnecticut Appellate Court · 2020
- Total Recycling Services of Connecticut, Inc. v. Connecticut Oil Recycling Services, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- Total Recycling Services of Connecticut, Inc. v. Connecticut Oil Recycling Services, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011