Legal Opinion

Meaney v. Connecticut Hospital Ass'n

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided August 31, 1999No. SC 15895PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PETERS, J.

The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether, as a result of unconsummated negotiations for incentive compensation to supplement the salary and benefits provided by an enforceable employment contract, an employee may recover damages pursuant to a claim in restitution for unjust enrichment. The issue is not whether the employee has a contract claim for the payment of a reasonable incentive bonus, but whether, in the absence of such a contract, the employee has a right to recover the amount by which his services benefited his employer. This is an issue of first impression…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Clark-Fitzpatrick, Inc. v. Long Island Rail RoadNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Paschall's, Inc. v. DozierTennessee Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Henry S. Bloomgarden v. Charles B. CoyerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
  4. La Throp v. Bell Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Mulligan v. RiouxSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Vertex, Inc. v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  2. Town of New Hartford v. Connecticut Resources Recovery AuthoritySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
  3. Gagne v. VaccaroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
  4. Conn. Gen. Life Ins. Co. v. BioHealth Labs., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2021
  5. OBG Technical Services, Inc. v. Northrop Grumman Space & Mission Systems Corp. Ex Rel. TRW, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2007

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API