Legal Opinion

People v. Stiehl

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 22, 2011No. C066318PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*722Opinion

ROBIE, Acting P. J.

After the magistrate held defendant John Melvin Stiehl to answer on a charge of receiving stolen property, the Placer County District Attorney’s Office took an information to the court to be filed. The court clerk stamped the information “received,” but not “filed,” and placed it in the file for one of defendant’s other cases. This mistake was discovered after the statutorily mandated time for filing an information had passed, and the trial court granted defendant’s subsequent motion to dismiss on the ground the information was not timely filed.

On appeal, the People…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. CromerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Tregambo v. Comanche Mill & Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1881
  3. People v. BoggessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  4. People v. CarrCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  5. In Re GrayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lauren Casola v. Dexcom, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API