Legal Opinion

Dunkel v. Roth

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 7, 1941No. 32,734PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Julius J. Olson, Justice.

This was a statutory action to determine the boundary line between lots 17 and 18 in block 59, Arlington Hills Addition to St. Paul, pursuant to Mason St. 1927, § 9590. After trial had and findings made, judgment was entered, and defendants appeal.

The facts may be thus summarized: Block 59 is bounded on the east by Arcade street, on the south by Minnehaha street. Both are located upon section lines. As to the court’s finding of the true plat location of the line between the mentioned lots, we find no difficulty in sustaining the court. On this phase, in defendants’…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Benz v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
  2. Marek v. JelinekSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  3. Russell-Sage v. LarsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
  4. Lobnitz v. FairchildSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  5. Markusen v. MortensenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Theros v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  2. Trimpl v. MeyerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1955
  3. Neill v. HakeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  4. Aldrich v. WilsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API