Legal Opinion

United States v. Davis

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided August 9, 1990No. 85 Civ. 6090(KC)PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

CONBOY, District Judge:

This order is further to our Orders dated June 6, and July 2, 1990, relating to General Dynamic’s Third Motion to Compel Production of Documents Withheld by the Government and the Government’s Fourth Rule 37 Motion. In our July 2 Order, we agreed to open our June 6 Order such that we would view in camera all of the 1976-77 Documents and the Assorted Documents for which we had previously found General Dynamics’ invocation of the attorney-client privilege procedurally insufficient. In addition, General Dynamics was also directed to submit for in camera review…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated September 15, 1983 Marc Rich & Co. A.G., Intervenor-Appellant v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
  2. Chubb Integrated Systems Ltd. v. National BankDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1984
  3. In Re Grand Jury Subpoenas Dated Dec. 18, 1981, Etc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1982
  4. United States v. Calvin Bein, Thomas Deangelis, Albert Vitti, and Arthur BillupsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
  5. Cuno, Inc. v. Pall Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1988

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States ex rel. Stone v. Rockwell International Corp.District Court, D. Colorado · 1992
  2. Stratagem Development Corp. v. Heron International N.V.District Court, S.D. New York · 1994
  3. Itoba Ltd. v. Lep Group PLCDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1996
  4. Mr. & Mrs. "B" v. Board of Education of the Syosset Central School DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1998
  5. In re In-Store Advertising Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API