Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
FLAHERTY, Chief Justice.
This is an appeal from the order of the Commonwealth Court affirming the order of the PUC, which required appellants to file an application for a certificate of public convenience and necessity. The sole issue in the case is whether a joint venture which produces, transports by pipeline, and sells natural gas to a single end user is required by the Public *137Utility Code to file an application for a certificate of public convenience.
Energy Production Company produced and sold natural gas to various interstate pipelines and to local distribution…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Barasch v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Waltman v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
3Cited by14 opinions
- HIKO Energy, LLC v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Bridle Bit Ranch Co. v. Basin Electric Power CooperativeWyoming Supreme Court · 2005
- Independent Oil & Gas Ass'n of Pennsylvania v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Borough of Olyphant v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Delmarva Power & Light Co. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.