Stephens v. Worley
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
VAUGHN, Judge.
The sole issue is whether a judgment of acquittal in a criminal bastardy action, based upon a general verdict which does not include findings of fact, will sustain a bar of res j udicata to a subsequent civil action to establish paternity. We conclude that the doctrine of res judicata does not apply to the record in this case and reverse the entry of dismissal against Robeson County.
The doctrine of res judicata bars litigation of a matter in the following situation only:
when there has been a final judgment or decree, necessarily determining a fact, question or right in issue,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Masters v. DunstanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Bell v. MartinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- State v. EllisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Quintain Development, LLC v. Columbia Natural Resources, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Sampson County ex rel. Child Support Enforcement Agency v. StevensCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
- Settle ex rel. Sullivan v. BeasleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982