Legal Opinion

Settle ex rel. Sullivan v. Beasley

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 7, 1982No. 8110DC1333Published

1Opinion of the Court

WEBB, Judge.

We affirm the judgment of the District Court. When a final judgment has been rendered by a court which necessarily determines a fact, right or issue, that judgment is conclusive in a subsequent action involving the same fact, right or issue and either identical parties or persons in privity with parties to the earlier action. An estoppel by judgment must be mutual and where one party is not estopped, the adverse party cannot be estopped. See Tidwell v. Booker, 290 N.C. 98, 225 S.E. 2d 816 (1976); King v. Grindstaff, 284 N.C. 348, 200 S.E. 2d 799 (1973); Stephens v. Worley, 51 N.C.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. King v. GrindstaffSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  2. Masters v. DunstanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  3. Tidwell v. BookerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  4. Piedmont Memorial Hospital, Inc. v. Guilford CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  5. Stephens v. WorleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API