Legal Opinion
Steinberg v. Adams
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 20, 1950PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RIFKIND, District Judge.
Nine motions have been filed and argued in the two companion actions. I shall consider them in the order best calculated to simplify disposition.
7. Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment m the Steinberg Action.
The Steinberg action is a stockholder’s derivative action for the benefit of Thompson-Starrett Company, Inc. From the amended complaint it appears that the core of the controversy is the propriety of payments made by the corporation to defray the expenses incurred by two contesting parties in connection with an election of directors.
Prior to, and in connection with,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Arnstein v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
- Toebelman v. Missouri-Kansas Pipe Line Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
- Empire Southern Gas Co. v. GrayCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1946
- Hall v. Trans-Lux Daylight Picture Screen Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1934
- Hand v. Missouri-Kansas Pipe Line Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1944
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Visingardi v. TironeSupreme Court of Florida · 1966
- Rita Gottesman v. General Motors Corporation and E. I. Du Pont De Nemours and CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
- Rhoads v. McFerranCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Rhoads v. McferranCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Locke Manufacturing Companies v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1964
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.