Legal Opinion

Hall v. Trans-Lux Daylight Picture Screen Corp.

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided February 15, 1934PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor:

The bill in this case seeks to enjoin the Trans-Lux Daylight Picture Screen Corporation from expending any money or incurring any liability in connection with a contest for proxies for use at the annual meeting of stockholders of the corporation held in May of the year 1933, or in connection with a proceeding now pending in this court for a review of the results of that meeting. The bill prays that the individual defendants, directors of the corporate defendant, account to it and be directed to pay over to it any and all sums of money heretofore paid by the corporate defendant…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lawyers' Advertising Co. v. Consolidated Railway Lighting & Refrigerating Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1907
  2. Rascovor v. American Linseed Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1905
  3. Donalson v. Investors Realty Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1927
  4. Donalson v. Investors Realty Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1928

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Unocal Corp. v. Mesa Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1985
  2. Blasius Industries, Inc. v. Atlas Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1988
  3. Hibbert v. Hollywood Park, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1983
  4. Cheff v. MathesSupreme Court of Delaware · 1964
  5. Kors v. CareyCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1960

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API