Legal Opinion
Consiglio v. Administrator
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 22, 1951PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtInglis, J.
There are two questions to be decided in this case. They are, first, whether an employee is subject to the disqualification for unemployment benefits prescribed in General Statutes, § 7508 (2), if he leaves work at which he is being employed only part time to accept a better paying position, and, second, whether, if he leaves during a vacation period, his leaving dates from the beginning of that period or from the date of his actual leaving.
For a long time prior to July, 1949, the plaintiff had been in the employ of the Echlin Manufacturing Company. Commencing in January, 1949, the company,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Almada v. AdministratorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- Fannon v. Federal Cartridge Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
- Kelly v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
- Baldassaris v. EganSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
3Cited by15 opinions
- Robinson v. Unemployment Security Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Toothaker v. Maine Employment Security CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1966
- Dubkowski v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1963
- Fellin v. AdministratorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Jones v. California Employment Stabilization CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.