Legal Opinion

Salib v. City of Mesa

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 5, 2006No. 1 CA-CV 04-0436PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

IRVINE, Presiding Judge.

¶ 1 Edward Salib (“Salib”) appeals from the denial of his claim that the City of Mesa violates his right to free speech under the Arizona and United States Constitutions by limiting how much of his donut business’s windows can be covered by advertising signs. For the following reasons, we affirm.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶ 2 Salib owns a Winchell’s Donut House franchise within a designated redevelopment area of Mesa. To attract customers, Salib displays signs affixed to his store windows that advertise his products. On August 5, 2002, after giving Salib…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Members of the City Council of Los Angeles v. Taxpayers for VincentSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Clark v. Community for Creative Non-ViolenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Board of Trustees of State Univ. of NY v. FoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Antone v. GREATER ARIZONA AUTO AUCTION, INC.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  2. Korwin v. CottonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  3. Hanson v. Tempe Life Care Village, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  4. Coleman v. City of MesaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
  5. State v. StummerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API