Application of William Boon
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
BALDWIN, Judge.
Boon appeals from the decision of the Patent Office Board of Appeals which affirmed the rejection of claims 1-16 in his application 1 for an “Air Conveyor System.” No claim has been allowed.
THE INVENTION
The subject matter for which appellant seeks protection may best be understood by reading claim 1 (which is representa tive of one group of claims rejected on a particular ground) with reference to the following illustration from the disclosure:
Claim 1 reads as follows [parenthetic material corresponds to the illustration shown above — paragraphing ours]:
1. Improved pneumatic…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Brand v. ThomasCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1938
- Crown MacHine & Tool Co. v. K v P-Sutherland Paper Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1968
- Application of Paul DiedrichCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
- Application of Edward M. JonesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
- Application of Wilhelm Ahlert and Ernst KrugerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Inre: BiedermannCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- Application of Charles R. BarrCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
- In re BrebnerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
- Application of Charles R. BarrCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971