Legal Opinion
Inre: Biedermann
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided October 18, 2013No. 17-2223PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LINN, Circuit Judge.
Lutz Biedermann and Jurgen Harms (collectively “Biedermann”) appeal a decision of the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (“Board”), now the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, affirming the rejection of claims 32, 33, 35-37 37, 39, and 48 of U.S. Patent Application No. 10/306,-057 (“'057 Application”) for obviousness, 35 U.S.C. § 103(a). Ex parte Biedermann, No. 2010-006113, Application No. 10/306,-057, 2012 WL 3561836 (B.P.A.I. Aug. 16, 2012) (Decision on Request for Rehearing) (“Decision on Rehearing ”); Ex parte Biedermann, No. 2010-006113, Application No. 10/306,057,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Dickinson v. ZurkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Dickinson v. ZurkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- In Re KubinCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Belden Inc. v. Berk-Tek LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Genzyme Therapeutic Products Ltd. Partnership v. Biomarin Pharmaceutical Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- In Re: Nuvasive, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Honeywell International Inc. v. Mexichem Amanco Holding S.A. De C.V.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Knowles Electronics LLC v. IancuCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.