Legal Opinion
P. W. Husserl, Inc. v. Newman
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 22, 1960PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PALMIERI, District Judge.
This is an action brought by three customers of the defendant under section 2(e) of the Clayton Act, as amended by the Robinson-Patman Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 13(e). See 28 U.S.C. § 1337. The plaintiffs allege damage to their business as a result of the defendant’s alleged discriminatory practices in its sales of paper dress patterns. Forty applicants have moved for leave to intervene as plaintiffs pursuant to Rule 24(b) (2), Fed.R.Civ.P. 28 U.S.C.A.; the defendant has cross-moved for (1) an order pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(f) striking the class action allegations from…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Julius Nagler v. Admiral CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
- Federal Trade Commission v. Simplicity Pattern Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
- York v. Guaranty Trust Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- Oppenheimer v. F. J. Young & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- Kainz v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1952
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- William Harris v. Palm Springs Alpine Estates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- Minnesota v. United States Steel Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1968
- Kronenberg v. Hotel Governor Clinton, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1966
- Rodríguez Rosado v. Syntex (F.P.), Inc.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 2003
- Carroll v. Associated Musicians of Greater New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1962
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.