Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Brachbill

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 6, 1989No. 51 and 52 M.DPublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NIX, Chief Justice.*

Before us by allowance are the appeals of Steven Brachbill and Darrell Musser, from orders of the Superior Court affirming their convictions for certain criminal offenses. 363 Pa.Super. 615, 527 A.2d 113. We consolidated the appeals for argument and disposition.

Darrell Musser and Steven Brachbill were jointly tried before a jury in the Court of Common Pleas of Centre County. Mr. Musser was convicted of the offenses of Intimidation of Witnesses or Victims, 18 Pa.C.S. § 4952, and Criminal Conspiracy, 18 Pa.C.S. § 903. Mr. Brachbill was convicted of criminal…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Alderman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Colautti v. FranklinSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Cali v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  5. Commonwealth v. PopeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. RiosSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  2. Commonwealth v. PalmerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Commonwealth v. OglialoroSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Commonwealth v. Doughty, J., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  5. Commonwealth v. KelleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API