Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Kelley

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 19, 2002PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice NEWMAN.

Bernard Dale Kelley (Kelley) appeals from the Order of the Superior Court, which reversed the decision of the Court of Common Pleas of Susquehanna County (trial court) and remanded the case for trial. We granted review limited to the conclusion of the Superior Court that evidence of digital penetration can sustain a charge of sexual assault, 18 Pa.C.S. § 3124.1. 1 More- succinctly, we examine if the Superior Court erred in finding that evidence of digital penetration can sustain a charge of sexual assault, where said charge requires proof of sexual intercourse or deviate…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Phillips v. A-Best Products Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Commonwealth v. RhodesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Commonwealth v. BoothSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  4. Commonwealth v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  5. Commonwealth v. HarnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Hess v. Gebhard & Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Commonwealth v. MartinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Commonwealth v. JohnsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  4. Ruthrauff, Inc. v. Ravin, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  5. Commonwealth v. HartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API