Raghavan v. Boeing Co.
California Court of Appeal
[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MALLANO, Acting P. J.
The summary judgment statute (Code Civ. Proc., § 437c) permits a trial court to summarily adjudicate “one or more causes of action.” (Id., subd. (f)(1).) At trial, a “cause of action” that has been summarily adjudicated shall be “deemed to be established,” and the case “shall proceed as to the cause or causes of action . . . remaining.” (Id., subd. (n)(1).) A grant of summary adjudication as to one or more causes of action does not bar other causes of action as to which summary adjudication has been denied. (Id., subd. (n)(2).) And no one may comment on the grant…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Soule v. General Motors Corp.California Supreme Court · 1994
- Tiernan v. Trustees of California State University and CollegesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Jackson v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Ringler Associates Inc. v. Maryland Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 2000
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Arteaga v. Brink's, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2008
- Taylor v. United Parcel Service Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2010
- Belz v. Clarendon America InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Jogani v. JoganiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Safeco Insurance v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.