Legal Opinion

Schreiber Unemployment Compensation Case

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 11, 1958No. Appeal, Nos. 74 to 80PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Wright, J.,

The claims for unemployment compensation filed by George Schreiber, and six others in similar position, were denied by the Bureau, the Referee, and the Board of Review upon the ground that claimants’ unemployment during a labor dispute was not due to a lockout by the employer, wherefore they were ineligible for benefits under Section 402(d) of the Unemployment Compensation Law. Act of 1936, P. L. [1937] 2897, 402(d), 43 P.S. 802(d). Claimants have appealed.

Appellants were employed as servicemen by the Hygienic Sanitation Company, American and Wingohocking Streets,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Riehl v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  2. Hogan Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  3. Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  4. Kendall Refining Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  5. Ambridge Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Erie Resistor Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  2. Acme Corrugated Box Co. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. Junda Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API