Legal Opinion

Ambridge Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 17, 1956No. Appeal, No. 104PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Woodside, J.,

Georgia Antinopoulas, the claimant herein, was declared eligible for unemployment compensation benefits by the Bureau, the Referee and the Board of Review. Appellant, Ambridge Savings & Loan Association, the claimant’s last employer, contends that she should be disqualified under the provisions of Section 402(b) of the Unemployment Compensation Law of December 5,1936, P. L. 2897 (1937), as amended by the Act of March 30, 1955, P. L. 6, 43 P.S. §802 (b), which provides that a claimant shall be ineligible for unem*518ployment compensation benefits during any week in which his…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Stillman v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  2. Flannick Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  3. Michalsky Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  4. Kelleher Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  5. Lavely v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Page's Department Store v. VelardiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Genetin v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Dinges v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  4. Johnson Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  5. Martinez Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API