Legal Opinion

Twichell v. Guite

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided April 27, 1999No. AC 18019PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HEALEY, J.

The defendant Nancy L. Quite appeals from the trial court’s judgment denying her July 11, 1997 motion to open a judgment of strict foreclosure of a judgment lien rendered on February 19, 1997. In her motion to open, she alleged that she was defaulted for her failure to appear and sought to open the judgment because the trial court allegedly lacked subject matter jurisdiction. She contended that such jurisdiction was lacking because an indispensable party was not joined as a defendant. In addition, she alleged that she was made a defendant “when the plaintiff knew she was…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Dusky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Loisel v. RoweSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  3. Reynolds v. VroomSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
  4. Crest Pontiac Cadillac, Inc. v. HadleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  5. Shays v. Local Grievance CommitteeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Giulietti v. GiuliettiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  2. 1525 Highland Associates, LLC v. FohlConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  3. Elf v. Department of Public HealthConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  4. New Image Contractors, LLC v. Village at Mariner's Point Ltd. PartnershipConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
  5. McLaughlin v. SmoronConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API