Legal Opinion

In re Miller Bros. Grocery Co.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 2, 1915No. 2519PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Western Division of the Northern District of Ohio; John M. Killits, Judge. In the matter of the Miller Bros. Grocery Company, bankrupt. From an order (208 Fed. 573), reversing an order of the referee and allowing in full the claim of the Damson Company, the trustee appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

WARRINGTON, Circuit Judge.

The Miller Bros. Grocery Company and the Lamson Consolidated Store Service Company on November 1’5, 1911, executed a contract, in terms a lease, under which the Store Service Company installed a cable cash carrier system in the store of the Grocery Company in Toledo, Ohio, and on December 14, 1911, the work of installing the carrier system was completed. The lessee was to use the system on its premises for 7 years from date of installation, and for as many successive years thereafter as it might elect to extend the lease; but the lessor reserved the right to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lamson Consol. Store Service Co. v. BowlandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1902
  2. In re Miller Bros. Grocery Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1913

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Johnston v. Lamson Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1933
  2. Electrical Products Corp. v. MoskoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1931
  3. Mosler v. WoodellWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Lamson Co. v. Elliott-Taylor-Woolfenden Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1928
  5. Electrical Products Consolidated v. SweetCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API