Legal Opinion
Electrical Products Corp. v. Mosko
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided March 16, 1931No. 12,360PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hilliard
The plaintiff in error, plaintiff below, brings error to review a judgment of $77.94 in its favor, claiming that it was entitled to a greater sum. The plaintiff is the assignee of a California corporation of similar name, and the question presented concerns the interpretation and validity of a contract entered into between its assignor and the defendants for the construction and use of an electrical advertising sign made of glass tubing and filled with neon gas.
The contract was entered into between the defendants and a salesman of the plaintiff’s assignor on July 11, 1927, and approved and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lamson Consol. Store Service Co. v. BowlandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1902
- Standard Oil Co. v. DolginSupreme Court of Vermont · 1921
- In re Miller Bros. Grocery Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1915
- Warth v. MackCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1897
- In re Caswell-Massey Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1910
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Silver Dollar Club v. Cosgriff Neon CompanyNevada Supreme Court · 1964
- Industrial Leasing Corporation v. ThomasonIdaho Supreme Court · 1974
- Shel-Al Corporation v. American National Insurance Company and Exchange Security BankCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Ray v. Electrical Products ConsolidatedWyoming Supreme Court · 1964
- Wired Music, Inc. v. ClarkAppellate Court of Illinois · 1960
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.