Legal Opinion

In re Grodnik's, Inc.

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided February 28, 1955No. 19450PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NORDBYE, Chief Judge.

The Referee’s findings of fact are undisputed. The material facts are that the debtor and Highway Display, Inc., entered into a contract providing for the erection and maintenance of specially built display signs along highways near Minneapolis, Minnesota, for the purpose of advertising debtor’s clothing business. The contract provided for payments by debtor of $190 per month for thirty-six months, and contained a clause-permitting claimant to declare immediately due and payable any balance owing for the unexpired term, should any default occur in the payments. The debtor…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Goodell v. Accumulative Income Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  2. Electrical Products Corp. v. MoskoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1931
  3. Blunt v. EgelandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
  4. Mosler v. WoodellWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Lu-Mi-Nus Signs, Inc. v. Jefferson Shoe Stores, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1930

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Gorco Construction Co. v. SteinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  2. Western Oil & Fuel Co. v. KempCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1957
  3. Ray v. Electrical Products ConsolidatedWyoming Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Walker v. GrahamWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Woodger v. AMR Corp.Idaho Court of Appeals · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API