Legal Opinion

State v. Glover

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 13, 1988No. 87-237PublishedCited by 161 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.

The sole question posed by the instant appeal is whether the trial court erred in failing to grant appellee’s motion for dismissal of all charges against him on the basis that appellee had previously been placed in jeopardy on the same charges. We hold that the trial court did not err in proceeding to retrial.

There is no doubt that jeopardy had attached in this case by virtue of the first, aborted trial, since the jury had already been impanelled and sworn. Crist v. Bretz (1978), 437 U.S. 28. The question presented herein is whether appellee was protected from retrial by the constitutional…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Oregon v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. United States v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Wade v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1949

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by161 opinions

  1. State v. GarnerOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State v. HillOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. AhmedOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  5. State v. BrewerOhio Supreme Court · 2009

156 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API