Legal Opinion

P & R Welding & Fabricating v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 24, 1997No. 40 M.D. Appeal Docket 1996PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

CASTILLE, Justice.

The sole issue on appeal is whether the “gross method” or the “net method” should be utilized in calculating an employersVworkers’ compensation insurers’ subrogation rights and liabilities pursuant to Section 319 of the Workers’ Compensation Act, 77 P.S. § 671, with respect to an employee’s recovery in a third-party tort action. Because we hold that the gross method should be utilized in this situation, we affirm the order of the Commonwealth Court.

The relevant facts to this appeal are not in dispute. On July 28, 1985, appellant suffered a work-related…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rollins Outdoor Advertising v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Pendleton v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. CNA Insurance v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Allegheny Intermediate Unit 3 Education Ass'n v. Bethel Park School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Kramer v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Darr Construction Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. Mrkich v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. Kidd-Parker v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  5. Griffin v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API