Legal Opinion

Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Westmeyer

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 16, 1988No. D.D. No. 87-13PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

This court finds that respondent violated the aforementioned Disciplinary Rules indicated by the board. While we adopt the findings of the board, we reject the sanction recommended. Respondent is hereby ordered suspended from the practice of law in the state of Ohio for one year, that year being suspended on the condition that respondent satisfactorily complete a two-year probation period. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Sweeney, Lochee, Holmes, *264Douglas, Wright and H. Brown, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., dissents.

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Toledo Bar Ass'n v. DziennyOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Toledo Bar Ass'n v. WestmeyerOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Toledo Bar Assn. v. DziennyOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. BerkOhio Supreme Court · 2007