J. E. Bernard & Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
LawiugNCe, Judge:
An importation described on the consular invoice as “Metal cutting bandsaw blades” was classified by the collector of customs as “Mfr. articles of steel, nspf,” in paragraph 397 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 XJ.S.C. § 1001, par. 397), as modified by the Sixth Protocol of Supplementary Concessions to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 91 Treas. Dec. 150, T.D. 54108, and duty was imposed thereon at the rate of 19 per centum ad valorem.
Plaintiff claims that the merchandise should be classified as steel bandsaws, finished or further advanced than tempered and polished,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. Buss & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
- Nyman v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
- Snow's United States Sample Express Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1917
- Rogers v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
- Redden v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Baxter Healthcare Corp. of Puerto Rico v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1998
- Sandvik Steel, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
- Castelazo v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964
- Castelazo v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964
- Crown Curtis Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.