Legal Opinion

Sandvik Steel, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided January 12, 1971No. C.D. 4161PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NewmaN, Judge:

This protest concerns the proper rate of duty on certain merchandise described on the invoices as “Shoe Die Knife Steel” and “Dieflex Cutting Kule.” The merchandise was imported from Sweden in 1967, and was assessed with duty at the rate of 19 per centum ad valorem under the provision in item 657.20 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States (TSUS) for “Other” articles of iron or steel, not coated or plated with precious metal.

Plaintiff claims that the cutting rules are properly dutiable at the rate of 10 per centum ad valorem under item 649.67, TSUS, as “Other” knives and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. J. E. Bernard & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1963
  2. Nyman v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Avins Industrial Products Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1974
  2. Naftone, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
  3. Lee Enterprises, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1980
  4. Sandvik Steel, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1975
  5. Keystone Casing Supply, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API