Legal Opinion

Ivory v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 11, 2014No. ED 99916PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MARY K HOFF, Presiding Judge.

Christopher J. Ivory (Movant) appeals from the motion court’s Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Judgment (Judgment) denying his Rule 29.15 Amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Judgment and Sentence and Request for Evidentiary Hearing (PCR Motion), alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel. We affirm.

Factual and Procedural Background

In the underlying case, Movant, representing himself pro se but with a public defender present as standby counsel, was convicted of attempted forcible rape, Section 566.030 1, kidnapping, Section…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. TokarSupreme Court of Missouri · 1996
  3. Zink v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
  4. Worthington v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2005
  5. Moss v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2000

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sanders v. FalkenrathDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2023
  2. Tommy J. Davis v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2021
  3. Williams v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API