Legal Opinion

Warden-Pullen Coal Co. v. Wallace

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 17, 1936No. 26439PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

This suit was brought by defendant in error on behalf of herself and her three minor children, against the plaintiff in error, to recover damages for the death of her ’ husband. There was judgment for the plaintiff, and the defendant appeals. For convenience the parties will be referred to as they appeared in the lower court.

James C. Wallace, the husband of the plaintiff herein, was employed at the coal mine of the defendant, the Warden-Pullen Coal Company, in the area known as the Henryetta coal field, in the dual capacity of fireman and engineer. As engineer, it was ■his duty to operate the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Worlds v. Georgia RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896
  2. Ferguson v. Phoenix Cotton HillsTennessee Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Stenvog v. Minnesota Transfer Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
  4. Sandy Valley & Elkhorn Railway Co. v. TackittCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  5. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. SawyersCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Casualty Reciprocal Exchange v. SutfinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
  2. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Ry. Co. v. PerrymanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
  3. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. SkeenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  4. Evlo Refining & Marketing Co. v. MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  5. Davis v. Louisville & Nashville Railway Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1961

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API