Legal Opinion

Ferguson v. Phoenix Cotton Hills

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 1901PublishedCited by 34 opinions

PROM! .DAVIDSON. Appeal in error from Circuit Court -of Davidson County. John W. Chtldeess, J.

1Opinion of the CourtWilkes, J.

This is an action for damages for personal injuries. The plaintiff was employed as a laborer in the defendant mills. It .was one of his duties to remove wet cotton packed in a large box placed on a four-wheeled truck, from one kettle or vat to another, the distance being some fifty feet. He alleges - that through defective construction of the floor, and the presence of &> hole in -it, he was injured by one of the wheels of the truck falling into the hole. The plaintiff, with another, tried to lift the truck out of the hole, and his contention is that he was ruptured either by the strain of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Brown v. Electric Railway Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Knox v. Pioneer Coal Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Haviland v. Kansas City, Pittsburg & Gulf RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1903
  2. Stenvog v. Minnesota Transfer Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
  3. Moore v. Chattanooga Electric Railway Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Acme Box Co. v. GregoryTennessee Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Sorenson v. Northern Pacific Ry. Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1917

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API