Legal Opinion
Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Youngstown Steel Door Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided August 17, 1988No. Civ. A. 87-7056PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
NEWCOMER, District Judge.
Presently before me is this action for indemnification brought by Consolidated Rail Corporation against Youngstown Steel Door Company and The Lamson & Sessions Company. A nonjury trial was held on June 20, 1988. After discussing defendants’ motion for summary judgment, I make my findings of fact and conclusions of law.
I.Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment
At the start of trial, I denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment as untimely filed because it was filed on June 13, 1988, one week before the case was called to trial yet approximately three weeks…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Philadelphia Electric Company v. Hercules, Inc. And Gould, Inc. Appeal of Hercules, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Edward Rabatin v. Columbus Lines, Inc. And Union Carbide Corporation. Appeal of Columbus Lines, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- Tugboat Indian Co. v. A/S Ivarans RederiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Wingo v. Celotex Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987
- Besser Co. v. Paco Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
3Cited by5 opinions
- Agere Systems, Inc. v. Advanced Environmental Technology Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
- Foulke v. DuganDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2002
- Travelers Indemnity Co. v. StedmanDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
- Ultramed, Inc. v. Beiersdorf-Jobst, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1998
- Industrial Alloy Fabricators, Inc. v. Williams Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1999