Legal Opinion
Ultramed, Inc. v. Beiersdorf-Jobst, Inc.
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided June 24, 1998No. 96-1555PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM and ORDER
NEALON, District Judge.
In this diversity action, plaintiff Ul-tramed, Inc., (Ultramed) has filed a complaint against defendant, Beiersdorf-Jobst, Inc. (Jobst) alleging breach of contract, breach of express warranty, breach of implied warranty, fraud in the inducement, and indemnification. Plaintiff seeks to be compensated for 2.1 million dollars which it claims it had to pay to the United States Government because it overbilled Medicare in the sale of Jobst Extremity System 7500 pumps based on the representations of Jobst that the pumps qualified for a higher reimbursable…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Neville Chemical Company v. Union Carbide CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- Losch v. Borough Of ParkesburgCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Svetz for Svetz v. Land Tool Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Martinique Shoes, Inc. v. New York Progressive Wood Heel Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kelly, R. v. The Carman Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
- Gordon v. Northwest Airlines, Inc. Longterm Disability Income PlanDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2009
- American Premier Underwriters Inc. v. General Electric Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2012
- Kelly, R. v. The Carman Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
- PHICO Insurance v. Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County2000