Legal Opinion

Ethridge v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided January 6, 1915No. 3364PublishedCited by 18 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIDSON, Judge.

The case originated in the County Court by filing complaint charging appellant- with gaming. There was no information filed, appellant was tried only on the complaint. Motion in arrest of judgment was based on the failure of the county attorney to file a complaint [information]. This was overruled by the court, it seems, on the theory that appellant had gone to trial without raising the objection that the information had not been filed. This is not a valid reason. Nor did it constitute waiver.

The Constitution, article 5, section 17, among other things, provides that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Leal v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1907
  2. Baker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1908

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Hullum v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1967
  2. King v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
  3. City of Dothan v. HollowaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  4. Kneedler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1936
  5. Day v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1934

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API