Hullum v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
McDONALD, Presiding Judge.
The offense is theft by false pretext; the punishment, 30 days confinement in jail.
The evidence reveals that prior to April 15, 1965, appellant was employed as a deputy sheriff of Travis County, and that he resigned on that date and was thereafter employed by Central Investigation Agency, a corporation engaged in the business of making bail bonds and private investigations.
During the period from April 19 to April 22, 1965, two sons of the complaining witness, Mrs. J. E. Wimberley, were being held by the juvenile authorities of Travis County as the suspected…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Quarles v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1964
- Dittfurth v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1904
- Cameron v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1966
- In re WilcoxNew York Supreme Court · 1934
- Ethridge v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1915
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by165 opinions
- Kincaid v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
- King v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Rodriguez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2007
- Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
- Queen v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1985
160 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.