Legal Opinion

Day v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided May 2, 1934No. 16673PublishedCited by 8 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Conviction for polluting a creek; punishment, a fine of $200.

This prosecution seems to have originated in the county court of Rusk County. The complaint was sworn to and filed in the office of the county clerk on September 8, 1988. If any information was filed, based on said complaint, same does not appear in the record. It appears in the judgment that appellant refused to plead to the charge contained in the complaint because there was no information. The same matter was complained of in appellant’s, motion for new trial.

Regardless of whether appellant had pleaded in person…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ethridge v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1915
  2. Norton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Kneedler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1936
  2. Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1947
  3. Adcock v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1948
  4. Diez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1952
  5. Steinman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1949

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API